iDIDJ Australia Didgeridoo Cultural Hub

Tuomas · Joined: 23 Mar 2007 Posts: 20 Location: Finland, Helsinki

I have tryed to listen mago masters playing and I am not quite sure how they make the first part of the basic wamp.

As written it is: di ta mor

My question is conserning the first part di/dith:

Is this sound made by plasing your tongue to upper part of the gum making the sound more hitting as "dith"?

or

Is it the sound made by squesing hardly your cheeks as making the sound "with" very hardly?

Thanks,

Tuomas

_________________
Tuomas Kylänpää
tuomas@didgeridoo.fi
www.didgeridoo.fi
www.myspace.com/tuomaskylanpaa

kdidj · Joined: 23 Mar 2007 Posts: 255

Hi Tuomas,

This can be played in a number of ways. The most important thing is that the resultant sound sounds correct!

If you say 'di ta mor' it will come out right, but the power in the 'impact' section (the dit) comes from aspirating this section, i.e. making it really breathy.

Keep practicing this until it sounds right. It's the correct combination of tonguing and pressure that will create the power here.

Kyle

_________________
www.kdidj.com
www.myspace.com/kylemaplesden

flyangler18 · Joined: 23 Mar 2007 Posts: 394

Hi Tuomas:

As usual, excellent advice from Kyle! Don't get wrapped up in the specific syllables and focus instead on getting the right sound. The thing to remember is that 'di ta mor' (using the notation on Darryl's Masterclass CD) is an English approximation at best, and getting trapped in focusing on 'exact' pronunciation is a pitfall of many Western players.

Jason

_________________
www.jdidj.com

Tuomas · Joined: 23 Mar 2007 Posts: 20 Location: Finland, Helsinki

Thanks Kyle and Jason,

that's what I thought too.

Every player sings the rythms differently and the singing may not have nothing in common what they do when they are actually playing.

I go back and practise more and test out various tonguings and pressures. I really like how "The Bomb" made those "dit" parts, heavy and powerfull...

Tuomas

_________________
Tuomas Kylänpää
tuomas@didgeridoo.fi
www.didgeridoo.fi
www.myspace.com/tuomaskylanpaa

ididjaustralia · Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 9:20 pm Post subject: Re: Is it "dith" or "with"?

Hi Tuomas,

Good question and answered appropriately before I could chime in!

Just my 2 cents worth... getting the right sound is a technical thing, in that the 'phrasing' and the mechanics are precise. However, trying to notate that or using the alphabet to write these sounds does not convey the movement of the tongue and other things that are happening inside the mouth, so just be aware of the limitations of seeing "di ta mor" in writing and trying to repeat that with a didj.

Feel free to upload sound clips here for comments too!

I've just recorded myself on a Wangga didgeridoo as my recording of it in the field was not very good due to wonky microphone placement etc. I'm uploading the clip here for comments and feedback on playing style and instrument characteristics. Let me know what you think.

_________________
iDIDJ Australia - Didgeridoo Cultural Hub
E-mail: info@ididj.com.au
Web: www.ididj.com.au
YouTube: www.youtube.com/ididjaustralia

kdidj · Joined: 23 Mar 2007 Posts: 255

Hey Guan,

It sounds good my friend!

The one thing I really like about Wangga is the use of what I call the 'Higher Passive Voice' (HPV) which is essentially the PV an octave higher which creates a very different interference pattern. This seems to be used as an accent and has much more punch than the standard PV.

One thing you should add is the doubled up entry (emboldened below) after the stops. Using 'old school' phonetics the rhythm would be:

...didjemro didgemro di (stop) didjem-de-didjemro didjemro...

Other than that no probs!

Kyle

_________________
www.kdidj.com
www.myspace.com/kylemaplesden

flyangler18 · Joined: 23 Mar 2007 Posts: 394

This sounded great, Guan. It's good to hear you play, friend.

I especially like the stops- nice clean and precise. Still muckin' around with these myself- need to get a clip up before too long.

Jason

_________________
www.jdidj.com

ozmadman · Joined: 09 Jul 2007 Posts: 50 Location: UK

Hi Guan

I agree, crystal clear playing and a beautiful sounding instrument

Thanks for posting it Very Happy

Paul

_________________
Breathe and Chill then your Yidaki/Mago will sound Brill
Paul (OZMADMAN)
http://www.didjnt.com
http://uk.youtube.com/profile?user=ozmadman

ididjaustralia · Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 10:55 am Post subject:

Thanks guys for the comments.

I'll try your suggestion Kyle, there's lot of other rhythms I'd like to re-visit being so out of practice but listening to some of the best mago players in recent weeks, I can't help but be inspired!

Guan

_________________
iDIDJ Australia - Didgeridoo Cultural Hub
E-mail: info@ididj.com.au
Web: www.ididj.com.au
YouTube: www.youtube.com/ididjaustralia

flyangler18 · Joined: 23 Mar 2007 Posts: 394

Here's a little recording for you- I've been working on the stops and getting a bit more 'snarl' in the rebound. This particular stick is one of my favs- a lovely little F#. Some of you already know it!

_________________
www.jdidj.com

Tuomas · Joined: 23 Mar 2007 Posts: 20 Location: Finland, Helsinki

ididjaustralia wrote:

Just my 2 cents worth... getting the right sound is a technical thing, in that the 'phrasing' and the mechanics are precise. However, trying to notate that or using the alphabet to write these sounds does not convey the movement of the tongue and other things that are happening inside the mouth, so just be aware of the limitations of seeing "di ta mor" in writing and trying to repeat that with a didj.

Here we go again - new clip...

I know the limitations of alphabetic notations... and there are so many people all over the world who everyone "hear" the written lyrics differently... but there is something behind those words that can help us understand the structure of the ryhms and give clues to how you work them out in your mouth and with your lips.

Tuomas

_________________
Tuomas Kylänpää
tuomas@didgeridoo.fi
www.didgeridoo.fi
www.myspace.com/tuomaskylanpaa

kdidj · Joined: 23 Mar 2007 Posts: 255

It's good Tuomas but the middle section of the vamp is very twangy and more Western/Contemporary in style. Try flattening your tongue here instead of making the 'eee' sound. It's sounding like 'Dit weee oh' - try and make it sound more like 'Dit way oh' and it'll sound more WAL in nature.

Kyle

_________________
www.kdidj.com
www.myspace.com/kylemaplesden

Peter Lister · Joined: 10 Apr 2007 Posts: 214 Location: Australia

Tuomas wrote:

I have tryed to listen mago masters playing and I am not quite sure how they make the first part of the basic wamp.

HI Tuomas et al,

sorry I'm late to this - especially as all the experts have already contributed and probably satisfied your curiosity, but I found your choice of words a good example of the problem itself. I thought it funny, quaint - in a nice way Tuomas, that you asked "in the first part of the basic wamp" - because we'd say "vamp". Of course I know why you've slipped there, but it is funny that you were asking a similar question, is it not ?? Well, I'd like to think you see the funny side of that. Trying to communicate in a written fashion is difficult enough - but here we are trying to describe physical actions which are not easily translated in amanner that all can understand. That's a real challenge - especialy with a culture that never had a written language.

As written it is: di ta mor

and that old man "Bomb" always sounded like he was saying "Lit-deh-morr" & "Lit-de-demorr" - so it's more about tongue position and "d" and "l" both have the tongue tip in a similar postion, and as others have said, it's so difficult to notate something like this thatis comprehendable and translatable to the actions involved.

cheerio,

Peter.

Tuomas